Back to Top

Author Archives: kluttz

Apostasy!

The following is a public preview of the introductory chapter to the author’s upcoming book, Apostasy! This book will be based largely on the resarch work in the Wolves in Wool series on this blog.


  A cancer is spreading at an alarming rate in the modern church.  It expresses a heretical doctrine which exchanges the glory of the gospel of Christ for temporal gains that were once known as the very temptations of man.  Heresy has become mainstream in an enormous population of Christendom.  Sadly, much of the church today is too biblical illiterate to notice.  The concept of orthodoxy has been given over to a competitive attitude by which doctrine is relegated to a local flavor.  While heresy has always existed in the church, never has there been a time when “exotic and unfamiliar” were considered the creative virtues of preaching that they are today.  The past few hundred years have been celebrated as times when enigmatic and incomprehensible creeds have been taken to task by a doctrinally savvy congregation and errors reproved by the biblical preaching of proven men of God.  The tables seem to have turned entirely.  In today’s religious circles it is old-school holdouts with the audacity to cling to the scriptures who are in the minority.  It is a truly remnant church today which continues to preserve sound biblical fundamentals at the persistent ridicule of a new majority of doctrinal thrill-seekers.

They scream dissent from untold thousands of books, television networks and millions of websites.  Entire supposedly “Christian” publishing houses have abandoned their former scriptural faith principles in favor of new proposals which, frankly, move more books off of store shelves.  Christian bookstores, devoted more to their bottom line than the Lord’s, have likewise lifted not one finger in any measurable way to dissuade them.  Countless modern congregations have jumped an entire generational cog; with an old-guard too tired or unwilling to fight for doctrinal purity and a new, younger work force that will only bother to show up if things are considered hip, novel, and decidedly not-too-biblical.  Bereans are sparse; having been rapidly replaced by giddy, temperamental consumer-types who crave the latest “star” pastor’s deposition over the eyewitness testimonies of the apostles.  The recipe for the modern pulpiteer calls for less scriptural content and more bizarre showmanship, to the extent of being positively juvenile.

Evangelicalism is in sincere trouble.  Authentic Christians are relegated to a tireless search to find a church that preaches the Bible at all, as today’s pulpits more commonly stream self-help infomercials which refuse to mention, let alone offer remedy for man’s greatest issue: sin and man’s need for redemption.  Churches have redefined ministry and missions in the image of public service fraternities.  The gospel being proclaimed in so many supposedly “thriving” congregations is shallow enough to disappoint a Unitarian.  Reminiscent are Jesus’ words to the church in Sardis, “You have the reputation of being alive, but you are dead.”[1]

Fueling these trends are a growing number of pastors who have committed themselves to unadulterated apostasy on the grounds that it produces the desired results.  This new breed of pseudo-theologian teaches, through contrived and corrupt exegetical processes, things which in some cases completely reverse the truths of scripture.  Man is instructed not on his depravity and need for salvation, but on his alleged posture of value before God’s grateful eye.  Christ is presented not as the crucified lamb but the exemplary enabler of human potential.  Scripture is not promoted as the inspired testimony of God by which men are convicted, redeemed and trained for His eternal service, but the means by which they can learn the secrets of acquiring their best life now.

While such a dire state of the church is heart breaking to those who love her, it is not something which has taken the student of God’s word by surprise.  This emerging apostasy has been articulately forewarned in scripture; a word of caution to each generation that the roots of their faith will be challenged from within at a future juncture.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 (ESV)
3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, 4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

Surely such times are now at hand.  Paul could not have more articulately portrayed the state of the modern church.  The tested and proven methodology of starting new churches today is to send a group of surveyors into a neighborhood to determine the type of church that neighborhood would want to support.  We are, in effect, asking the lost to dictate the function of the church.  We may as well be determining which fast food franchise to inject into a business center.  With the platform for church growth being the edification of everything people want to hear, the church has become nothing more than another consumer-oriented business.  To the upwardly mobile, churches promise a leadership role in the renovation of culture.  They are assured to be doing the work of Christ simply because they engage themselves in the types of things that Jesus did.  To the poor and lowly is a promise of redemption; not from sin, but from the poverty which has stricken them due to their lack of “proper application” of God’s Word.  To the ill is the promise of God’s full earthly reversal of their sicknesses, if only they will learn how to properly ask him.  The church has become utterly user-friendly, offering carefully researched theological products which are in demand by the intended congregational target.

Numerous are the magical prayer books which give the correct formulas for invoking God’s response to one’s request, as if He were a cosmic genie who must only be suitably addressed for his magic to work.  At the end of this process, man has taken the role of deity, dictating his will to an obedient subordinate; and God himself is that humble servant.  With cleverly orchestrated theological arguments which attempt to make this doctrine seem biblical, these false teachers have relegated man to a place of power, success and great personal glory, while almighty God becomes nothing more than a grand enabler of man’s creative capacity.  Shortly, even Shirley McClain will be pleased to join one of our mainstream mega-church congregations.

In the charismatic world, the “Word of Faith” movement represents the largest organized purveyor of these types of consumer-oriented doctrines.  This work will focus specific attention to this movement in the hopes of illuminating the truths of scripture as a warning to the millions who are being systematically indoctrinated by this group.  Through religious television networks and an increasing number of local congregations buying into the sheer hype, the Word of Faith movement has generated non-stop sensationalistic and un-verifiable claims that challenge everything the world has ever identified as orthodox faith.   This work is not an attempt to engage heresy in debate, but to reveal it to individual readers for what it is.  The true church must understand the nature of what she will battle in the coming days and years.  These groups are steadily permeating the wheat field with tares while a lost and dying world is being cross-evangelized by false apostles utterly incapable of presenting the true gospel; for they do not know it themselves.

The end result of this counterfeit ministry will be an ever increasing wake of souls who are either happily deceived and relegated to an eternity of death, or are so damaged from their failed foray into “religion” that they write off Christ entirely as a charlatan who must be of the same essence as his phony ministers.  Too often the deceived think they have experienced the fullness of Christ’s grace and find it lacking.  Sadly, many walk away from anything with the Name of Christ attached to it from that point forward.

To that end, the responsibility of identifying and preaching against false doctrines is of major importance to those who live to affirm and defend the teachings of scripture.  While scripture clearly indicates that an apostasy waits the latter days, it nevertheless demands the faithful of Christ to contend earnestly for the truth which transcends all times and cultures.

As Jude warns,

Jude 1:3-4 (ESV)
3 Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. 4 For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.


 

[1] Revelation 3:1 

 

 

 


[1]
Revelation 3:1

The Spirit World (book): Free to ReturningKing.com readers!

We’re giving away The Spirit World book to ReturningKing.com readers!

image The Spirit World is a study of the afterlife in scripture.  Far from simply referring to “Heaven and Hell,” the scripture reveals an assortment of containers which temporarily sort the souls of men and angels prior to the eternal state.  Places such as Sheol, Abaddon, and the Abyss are commonly used interchangeably by well-intended teachers of scripture.  Yet, scripture itself does not use these terms interchangeably at all; for each has a unique characteristic among the others.

The Spirit World provides a thorough examination of these terms and others, while time lining the course of human and angelic history from creation to the eternal state.  Additionally, The Spirit World will examine the nature of the judgments of the righteous and the wicked, as these actions are the trigger events which relegate men from the temporary to the eternal abodes.

Continue Reading

The Posture of Prayer

We’ve all had that friend who is never heard of lest there be a need we may somehow support.  As surely as the phone rings and the caller ID has identified the suspect, we know in fact that they need something; otherwise they would not be calling.  Perhaps nothing is more offensive to a relationship than being only used as a ‘resource’ by those we consider friends.

It makes one ponder how often God may have made this judgment concerning our conversation to him.  Of course, prayer is and should be the means by which we make our requests known to God.  Jesus said as much in his ‘model prayer’ in the Sermon on the Mount, noting that we should ask God to “give us this day our daily bread.”  But before the call for help and the plea for forgiveness, that same model prayer also postures us properly that our entire prayer life not be like the friend who only calls when they need something.

Jesus said, “9  Pray then like this: ‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name. 10  Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.’” (Matthew 6:9-10 (ESV))

Before anything else is the recognition of whom exactly we are addressing.  We are seeking the author of life to whom all belongs; he who is “hallowed” by his very name.  “Hallowed” comes from the Gk. hagiazo, “holy” or “venerated.”  When we call on his Name, we call not on the ‘man upstairs’ but the judge of our every act and thought who by grace alone in his provision of Christ alone has received us to his ear as his beloved children instead of his enemy.  When we call on HIS name, it’s something far different from “hey, Steve – pass the salt” and much more akin to what our attitude should be when speaking in front of a judge – guilty as charged – yet finding the leniency of the court.

The second phrase of Jesus’ model prayer further establishes our posture before this great God.  “Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.”  Truly knowing that it is the author of life with whom one speaks, how can the first thing out of one’s mouth be essentially, “stop everything you’re working on and give me a hand here, would ya?”

It is at this point that the profound nature of prayer is revealed in Jesus’ words.  While prayer is commonly valued as the means by which we ask God for what we want, it should rather be understood as the means by which we ask God to reveal what He wants.  That’s not to say that our desires are not to be voiced, but they are to be voiced from within the context of the subject speaking to the King, whose concern for His Kingdom will always – rightly – overshadow any and all further noise.

There are far too many supposed “prayer books” on our Christian bookstore shelves enticing people to attempt to manipulate the only one in the room who knows better.  Our King does not answer prayer because one has learned the proper phrasing with which to send it.  He answers prayer out of his regard for his own sovereignty over his creation and the implementation of his will.  Thus, John says, “14  And this is the confidence that we have toward him, that if we ask anything according to his will he hears us.” (1 John 5:14 (ESV))

Our posture before God as his servants is paramount for us to be in the right mind to pray wisely and God (by his own Word) to be pleased in hearing it.

I shudder at the thought that if God were like one of us, He might rather roll his eyes upon seeing my name on his caller ID.

Loving Those We Dislike

[Originally published in The Fort Bend Herald]

 One of the most difficult concepts of Christianity involves a series of commands that relegate us to love pretty much everyone, everywhere and in every situation.  While the sentiment of that seems truly noble and altruistic, many find themselves in a very difficult crisis of faith for the simple fact that there are some people we honestly find very hard to like.  “Liking” involves commonality in thought or position.  It involves someone we consider compatible and worthy.  It involves reciprocity.  Indeed, all of us have those around us of whom these traits simply do not exist.  We simply do not “like” everyone.  How, then, are we to love them?

The first order is to confirm the need for such indiscriminating love in the scriptures.  Indeed, Jesus tells us to love our neighbor (Mt 22:39).  The apostles teach us to love one another in the church (Rom 12:10) and our spouses (Eph 5:25).  These emanations of love seem easy enough to fulfill; or at least a realistic goal to shoot at- until we realize that even these two commands come with caveats:  Jesus said to love our neighbors as ourselves, and Paul instructed husbands to love their wives as their own bodies.

But wait: it gets worse, for Jesus further said that we should love even our enemies! (Mat 5:43-44)  This instruction, he follows with, “For if you love those who love you… do not even the tax collectors do the same?” (v. 46)

Now the sentiment is getting downright troublesome.  Let’s face it, it’s hard at times to love even those people we share Thanksgiving Dinner with – let alone those who have earned the moniker of “enemy.”  For all practical purposes, the very definition of “an enemy” is someone that in the very least we do not like at all.  How, then, are we to love those we (sometimes for good reason) simply do not like?

The bad news is this is not an easy pursuit, even when properly understood.  The good news is most of us have completely misunderstood this set of commands because of language issues.

“Love,” in English is an extremely flexible term.  We love our spouses and we love our dog.  (Surely those two do not mean the same thing.)  We love certain forms of art.  We love chicken fried steak and we love our children.  Each of these things gets coined as “that which we love” but with significantly distinct meanings and inferences that actually separate this idea of “love” into numerous categorically different things altogether.

In the New Testament there are two different Greek terms translated into English as “love.” One term is the term most similar to that “love” we claim for our families and friends.  The other is a sense of the idea of “love” that frankly, we do not use very often in conversational English.  (There is no Greek equivalent to our love for chicken fried steak to my knowledge… that must be an English thing.)

The lesser used term for “love” in the NT (about 20 times) is phileo (phil-eh’-oh); often referred to as “brotherly love.”  Such is the namesake for the city of Philadelphia and various other English terms with the “phile” suffix.  This term is best understood as “relational” love.  It is that “I love you because you and I have a personal connection.”  This term best fits with our love of family and friends, because it is reciprocal: the love we have for those we “like.” Most of us are thinking of THIS type of love when we hear the command to “love your enemies.”  But, relax – that is not the command we have been given.

The second and far more common “love” in the NT (over 250 times) is agape (ah-gah’-pay) (n) or agapao (ah-ga-pah’-o) (v).  This is (potentially) unreciprocated love.  It is a love that is chosen, deliberate and service oriented; but not necessarily relational.  To love in this manner is tantamount to Jesus’ golden rule: to treat others as we wish to be treated.  This is the love we are administering when we give money to help feed or clothe total strangers.  It is the love we are sharing when we stop to help a stranger on the side of the road.  These are not reciprocal actions:  I’m not helping because I realized that was a friend of mine I just passed on the highway.  These are chosen, deliberate acts of service to others out of reverence for their creator and recognition of their need.

While both types of love are commanded in scripture in various scenarios, we are ten times more often commanded to agapao those around us: love through service and with potentially nothing gained in return.  THIS is the love we are commanded to give our enemies.   We are to value them as human beings and provide them with dignity and service when able.  We should help them when in need.  We should speak kindly and act compassionately even if they are our political enemies or are on the “other side” of the culture war.  It is this love that God demonstrated toward us in that he loved us while we were his enemies (Rom 5:8).  In the same manner, we are to love our enemies; even if we don’t happen to like them.

The Spirit World: Chapter One (Sheol)

Sheol 

(This is a continuation of The Spirit World book series. This post assumes the prerequisite reading of earlier posts in the series.)

Giving consideration to the fact that the Bible is translated from the Hebrew and Greek languages (with some Aramaic), it is necessary to evaluate original language terms to have a consistent understanding of the meanings of the English terms which represent them in translation.  One of the first terms one encounters in the scriptures which refers to a hidden spiritual realm is the Hebrew term, Sheol.  Being Hebrew, Sheol is found, of course, in the Old Testament.  Sheol literally means “the grave” or “the world of the dead.”  It is frequently translated into English as “the grave” and at times, “Hell,” although “Hell” is not the best translation for modern English consumption as will be explained in chapter eight. Continue Reading

The Right Decision

[Originally published in The Fort Bend Herald]

 Perhaps the most common question a pastor is asked counsel on is simply, “what should I do?”  Many decisions that life throws at us are difficult.  Options have widely varying potential outcomes.  How can one know what the results of a decision will be?

While this is a complex issue this article has not enough space to answer fully, I’d like to focus on the very first question that should always be asked when making a difficult decision.  Many times, this one question is all that need be asked; as it will render null and void all further potential circumstances.

That question is simply, “is this really my decision?”  What is meant by the question is, “do I already have instructions on what I should choose (that perhaps I’m actually trying to avoid)?”

Christians overwhelmingly claim to have a biblical worldview and follow a biblical model of faith, practice and morality.  Yet, I’m surprised how often I’m asked about a decision that has already been made for those of us who claim such a position.  My experience is that people sometimes seek counsel because they are looking for “permission” of sorts, that they may in fact make the wrong choice with the blessing of someone else.  However, if I have a clear scriptural teaching on a subject, the answer to question one, for me, is “no.”

We who claim allegiance to Christ accept his terms that “if you love me you will keep my commands.”  In short, we have the overwhelming volume of God’s Word which already answers so many of life’s decisions very plainly.

“Should I misrepresent my marital status on my tax forms to save money?”  “Should I lie to someone when asked a question, which when answered, might make them upset?”  These are not my decisions.  They have already been made for me as one who bears Christ’s name and trusts his previously-given instructions.

In short, if there is a clear, biblical, “right” or “wrong” to follow, my decision should be already made.  I should to what is right.  No further consideration is needed.

While most believers agree in principle with this sentiment, they tend to begin to weigh outcomes rather than to act in faith when doing the right thing might cause some personal harm or inconvenience.  “What if doing the right thing gets me fired?”  “What if the right thing costs me a relationship?”  The truth is, we are temporal beings with no vision of the future.  We simply cannot know with any degree of certainty what the outcome of any decision will be.  We might do what we think will cause the best outcome only to be surprised that it did not turn out as expected.  Believers are not given the burden of such considerations when a clear biblical right and wrong are at stake.  We are called to choose what is right and let God sort out his own results.

Such is the nature of the lives of those who we consider heroes of our faith.  In Acts 7, Stephen died for doing the right thing; as did Christ himself in the gospel accounts.  And, in both cases, even though the right action brought about an undesirable temporal consequence, I never hear anyone preach a sermon on “how Jesus may not have died” or “Stephen’s big mistake.”  It is clear to us that it was God’s plan for these events – both the results of a right action – to bring further glory to himself; even though quite undesirable at the time.

Paul noted in Philippians 3:8 (ESV),
8  Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ.

This same Paul died at the hands of Nero for his unyielding faith.  We consider him a foundational example of what it means to serve Christ to the fullest.  Why should we necessarily expect a story book ending to our own cause of serving Christ?  On the other hand, after being imprisoned for his faith, Peter was miraculously freed (Acts 12). One simply cannot know what God has in store for a faithful decision.  But that result is His alone.  That, frankly, is what it means to have faith in God: not that He will do what we want – but that He will do as He wants.

Obviously, not every decision in life involves simple “right or wrong” as potential choices.  But sometimes it truly is that straightforward.  If scripture teaches a clear right and wrong in a given context, then for me, question one should be considered as “answered.”  This is not my decision.  It has already been made by He who I claim to trust and follow – to whatever end may come.

Jonah’s Misdirected Message

[Originally published in The Fort Bend Herald]

 Perhaps no Old Testament narrative receives quite the beating Jonah does by those who are unable to accept its account.  It is, after all, the story of a great miracle.  Strangely enough, most of those who reject it as truth are denying the wrong miracle altogether, as Jonah’s story is not the commonly cartooned account of a man making s’mores inside the belly of a whale by campfire.

The key issue of the account by most who reject it seems to be oriented around the fact that a man cannot live for three days in the digestive system of a great fish.  Of course, that which cannot be done – yet is – is the very essence of a “miracle.”  Yet, the real miracle of Jonah has nothing to do with a man living in a fish.  It is, for the doubter, actually much worse.

If one looks carefully at the Hebrew text of the story, the book in no way depicts a man “living” in a fish for three days, but rather a man dying and being resurrected three days later.    The miracle of Jonah is resurrection, not extreme survival “fish edition.”

The gist of the story is commonly upheld correctly:  Jonah, in disobedience to God’s call to preach to Nineveh (a large Syrian city, Israel’s greatest enemy of the time), flees by ocean in the opposite direction where he is cast overboard and swallowed by a great fish.  He prays to God and is three days later regurgitated onto dry ground by the fish, after which he returns to complete his mission.  Jonah was alive when cast from the boat.  He was alive when he was regurgitated onto dry ground.  The incorrect assumption is thus that he was alive for the duration of the ordeal.  He was not.

Chapter two accounts that Jonah, “prayed to the LORD…from the belly of the fish.”  In fact, Jonah was in the belly of the fish, but his account goes on to inform the reader that his body was in fact quite dead there while his spirit went to the “place of the dead.”  Verse 2 notes Jonah’s prayer (after the fact), “out of the belly of Sheol I cried, and you heard my voice.”  Sheol is the Hebrew name for the spiritual abode of the dead.  While the term can be used metaphorically, continued reading of this text informs us that a literal usage of Sheol is in fact what Jonah intended.  Verses 3-5 note Jonah being surrounded by flood waters, which “closed in over me to take my life” (v5) and that weeds (which would be on the bottom of the sea) “wrapped about my head.”  Finally, in verse 6 he notes “I went down to the land whose bars closed upon me forever; yet you brought up my life from the pit.”

“The pit” is translated from the Hebrew term shahat (shakh’-ath), which is another term related to Sheol in the Old Testament (Ps 55:23, Isa 51:14).  It is where the spirits of dead people went; the “place of the dead.”  Jonah clearly depicts his condition as that of having drowned, then having been swallowed by a fish, and then having been “brought up from the pit,” or resurrected at some point (likely immediately) before being spit out onto dry ground by the fish.

The story of Jonah is that he died and was resurrected on the third day.  Any other understanding misses the whole point of what Jesus later said to the Pharisees:

(Matthew 12:39-40 (ESV))  …“An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.
40  For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

Jesus did not build a campfire and make s’mores in the grave any more than Jonah did.  He was dead and raised, just as Jonah was dead and raised.

The message of Jonah is one of resurrection from death.  For this reason alone it was a worthy archetype for Christ to fulfill in full view of his generation of unbelieving Jews.

May our generation understand that denying one miracle – especially in light of Jesus’ own acceptance of it – is to deny the power of the same God who performed the latter as its fruition in Christ.

To deny Jonah because of its miraculous claims is to deny Christ of his.  But if one can believe Christ was dead and three days later raised to life, one should have no problem with Jonah – whose story Christ referenced as his own script.

Hidden Treasure

[Originally published in Fort Bend Herald]

 It seems we all have pursuits in our lives which honestly are of no measurable eternal consequence.  Simply put, we collect things that we perceive to enrich our lives in some tangible way, but that will most certainly be left behind for others to fight over when we depart from this Earth.  From the time of our first job a wish list is started of things that we will pursue and draw satisfaction from owning, using and maintaining; with the latter being the most difficult commitment of product ownership of all.

The fleeting nature of “stuff” has been recently illustrated to me through a classic Robalo boat.  I’ve been around boats all my life and from young adulthood have continually either pursued or endured boat ownership.  My current claim is a twenty five year old vessel that has truly surprised me with its quality, durability – and constant upkeep.

Being a salt water boat, rust is a constant enemy.  I recently acquired and rebuilt a trailer to haul the thing around at great expense of both finance and time invested.  That trailer has now been to the water three times and is already showing that faint, tell-tale sign of fresh rust on the springs, which I coated exceptionally well in a rust-blocking agent.  The clock is ticking.  I have three years before redoing the suspension.

If the trailer were the only maintenance concern I would probably gain two years of livelihood by the end.  But, the fact is that every single portion of this blessed mission of mine deteriorates with a vengeance.  Trailer lights are rewired every few years due to salt water infiltration destroying the copper wiring.  The exterior of the boat must be regularly deoxidized, waxed and repaired from sun damage, nicks and scrapes.  The gauges take turns in monthly increments giving up the ghost while the engine could write its own factory service manual at this point.  The simple fact is, I actually plan out – to the best of my entirely ignorant reckoning – what I expect to break next and how I will have the funding, time and knowledge to repair it when it does.  If I were not a bit of a masochist, actually enjoying my labors on this eternal project of a possession, I might be inclined to let her win quickly and just sink her to the bottom of the ocean.

It is no wonder to me that Jesus said, “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.” Matthew 6:19-21 (ESV)

There exist irreconcilable differences between every atom in this created universe and our own eternal nature and calling.  As it has wisely been stated, “you can’t take it with you,” we might also consider the question, “why would we want to?”  The scriptures teach us that we who are in Christ will one day be resurrected to new bodies, impervious to degradation or death.  We will be ushered into an eternal dwelling place likewise equipped with interminable wealth requiring no maintenance whatsoever.  Until then, Jesus informs us that we have the privilege of storing up true treasure for that day.

When the gospel is shared, eternal treasure is built.  When we serve others in Christ’s name, every hour spent yields countless benefit compared to beating our heads against our temporal projects.  How ironic that so often we find ourselves serving our Lord in ministry capacities only if we perceive ourselves “to have the time” from our pursuit of fretting over that which perishes.  May we rather pursue first that which is eternally rewarding, and only then “if we have time” turn our attention to that which we bother to hang onto for a little while. (Mat 6:33)  May our desires be to keep those things – and our true treasure – in their proper perspectives.  The stuff we can take with us is all that will matter on that day – even while others haggle over the remnants of our rotting possessions left behind.

What Kind of God?

[original article published in Fort Bend Herald, Sunday, February 24, 2013]

An age old question has found new life in recent debate concerning the seeming incongruity of an all-loving, all-powerful God being willing to bring the harshest of judgments upon his creation.  To be exact, the debate is generally kick started by some rendition of the question, “What kind of God would send people to an eternal judgment in Hell?”  The question is of course baited and the outcome presumed self-evident.  Supposedly one should nominate only a malevolent God as capable of such judgment.  Surely a loving God couldn’t be responsible for such harsh condemnation.

The answer tends to fall in one of several templated responses.  One group, believing the sentiment of the question, would say that in fact God does not send people to Hell at all.  Either Hell is an humanly-imposed product of the misinterpretation of Jesus’ (and the Old Testament Prophets, Apostles, church fathers, etc) words or in fact it is in some way a temporary sentence by which man can be properly refined, finding ultimate escape into eternal life.  Some believe in a form of annihilationism; that unbelievers will simply die without hope for Heaven, yet without judgment in Hell or any other punitive resort.  Some contend that God doesn’t ‘send’ anyone to Hell, but that men choose to go to Hell, as if they put their name in the wrong column of a sign-in sheet.  And some still hold to the classic Christian position that – in fact – we do serve the ‘kind of God’ who would sentence people to Hell and carry out such sentence first hand.

The question is only valid, of course, if in fact the scriptures claim that Hell is real and that God sends people there.  In the short space allotted, it can be quickly noted from the words of Christ himself that such is true.  Jesus’ account of his return and judgment speaks of the fate of the sinful in these terms: “(The King) will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.’” (Matthew 25:40-41)  Jesus affirms this position also in Matthew 10 and 23, along with numerous other references, yet from this text alone three things can be clearly seen: First, that Jesus proclaims a literal judgment of fire, second, that this judgment is eternal and third, that the King himself issues the sentence.  Other New Testament authors concur in clear language, such as Paul’s note in 2 Thes. 1:8-9, “He will punish those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.  They will be punished with everlasting destruction….” Thus, according to the scriptures, the question is valid: Just what kind of God would sentence people to Hell?

The question is actually answered clearly in the earlier portion of the 2 Thes. text above.  Verses 6-7 note, “God considers it just to repay with affliction… those who do not do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus.”  Romans 3 concurs, noting that until Christ took the full weight of the guilt of sin for the believer upon himself that in God’s forbearance “he had passed over former sins.  It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.” (v25-26)

Rarely does one question a judge who sentences a child molester to a life sentence in prison.  We consider the penalty of such sin justly carried out by the utter segregation of the offender for the duration of his life.  What kind of judge issues such a sentence?  A just one – who upholds the law and considers the crime truly reprehensible.  No further examination need be sought out for God’s upholding of his sentence for sin.  He is just.  He hates sin.  He will satisfy its sentence.

Thanks be to God that He is in fact also a loving and forgiving God.  In Christ he has taken out his full retribution on sin for those who trust Christ alone as their sacrifice of atonement.  But he remains yet just.  Every man’s sins will be punished: either through Christ or the sinner himself.

Quick to Listen – Slow to Tweet

Relationships once developed slowly via personal encounter.  Every chance meeting and handshake provided another casual conversation that gradually vetted the acceptable parameters of agreement on issues important to the two parties of a budding friendship.  To the degree that two people found familiarity and commonality a friendship developed.  Contrarily, when dissonance in virtue and ideology was uncovered a certain calculated distance was programmed into the relationship and the two parties silently negotiated an acceptable barrier for future encounters.  At the end of such process, legitimate friendship was the result of natural commonality between two people.  “Friends” were those who were generally in agreement with one another in areas considered important or desirable.

How profoundly certain things have changed in the social networking generation we now enjoy.  Becoming “friends” is in theory as simple as clicking a button on a Facebook profile screen of someone who perhaps has been never actually seen with the human eye of the friender.  Unlike the former process of methodically screening potential relationships through calculated conversation, now a person’s life story, political and social ideologies and a full array of revealing conversation with others is instantly displayed, organized and ingested in a single sitting.  Gone completely is the discipline once required to garnish such privileged information.

In this setting our lives are on display to a much wider audience than many seem to realize.  Things once said between friends with a wink of the eye are now heralded well beyond the privy of those who may have understood the sentiment of an inside anecdote.  The concept of an ‘inner circle’ simply does not exist in online form.  That which is posted on a social network is literally enshrined forever for public scrutiny.

The warning of James 1:19 must be seriously calulated more today than ever before: “let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger.”

It seems that every week I see some exceptionally awkward situation being aired in full living color on someone’s Facebook wall.  Personal disagreements are publicly posted in shameless attempt to illicit sympathy over issues which, if only left alone, would resolve themselvesg.  Yet, “quick to anger” translates to “quick to tweet” in our current social paradigm.  The frustration of the moment coupled with instant internet access persuades people to speak before they think and lash out before they listen.  The friendships of yesterday provided a built-in buffer from such rash behavior.  We went home, had a warm evening in the safety of family, slept on it and only then was the outside world encountered once again.

I was once told after a particularly frustrating conversation to write a letter to the person who had offended me stating everything I truly wanted to say.  Then, I was instructed to fold it up and read it again in twenty four hours and send it only if I still felt the same way.  Surprisingly to me, after twenty four hours I no longer wanted to say most of what I had written.  I threw the letter away in the end, and no damage was done to an important friendship.  What I practiced that day was the art of being “quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger.”

I would propose that any social networking post involving personal grievance be left alone entirely.  Yet, if you simply must write something, rather than posting it to the entire world why not email it to yourself, have dinner, hug your kids, sleep on it and then read it again tomorrow.  If it really needs to be said it will still need to be said tomorrow.  Let us practice being quick to listen and “slow to tweet” that our own sin of anger be not what is actually on display when we next click the ‘submit’ button and reveal our condition to all.